[NVisionIP] *****SPAM***** {Filename?} Re: Re: your document_all

Spam detection software, running on the system "amantadine.ncsa.uiuc.edu", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
postmaster@ncsa.uiuc.edu for details.

Content preview:  Warning: This message has had one or more attachments
  removed Warning: (document.txt .exe, document.zip). Warning: Please read
  the "NCSA-Attachment-Warning.txt" attachment(s) for more information.
  Please read the attached file! [...] 

Content analysis details:   (17.4 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 1.0 NO_REAL_NAME           From: does not include a real name
 0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
 1.4 SPF_SOFTFAIL           SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail)
[SPF failed: Please see http://spf.pobox.com/why.html?sender=warrendys%40hotmail.com&ip=200.11.95.13&receiver=amantadine.ncsa.uiuc.edu]
 1.4 MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID      Message-Id for external message added locally
 1.2 FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2   hotmail.com 'From' address, but no 'Received:'
-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
                            [score: 0.0000]
 0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE     RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
 3.9 RCVD_IN_XBL            RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
                            [200.11.95.13 listed in sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org]
 2.6 RCVD_IN_DSBL           RBL: Received via a relay in list.dsbl.org
                            [<http://dsbl.org/listing?200.11.95.13>]
 1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
                            postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
 1.9 RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL      RBL: NJABL: dialup sender did non-local SMTP
                            [200.11.95.13 listed in combined.njabl.org]
 1.6 MISSING_MIMEOLE        Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE
 0.3 MIME_BOUND_NEXTPART    Spam tool pattern in MIME boundary
 2.7 PRIORITY_NO_NAME       Message has priority, but no user agent name

The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to
open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus,
or confirm that your address can receive spam.  If you wish to view
it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.
--- Begin Message --- 
Warning: This message has had one or more attachments removed
Warning: (document.txt  .exe, document.zip).
Warning: Please read the "NCSA-Attachment-Warning.txt" attachment(s) for more information.

Please read the attached file!

+++ Attachment: No Virus found
+++ Kaspersky AntiVirus - www.kaspersky.com


This is a message from the MailScanner E-Mail Virus Protection Service
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The original e-mail attachment "document.zip"
is on the list of unacceptable attachments for this site and has been
replaced by this warning message.

If you wish to receive a copy of the original attachment, please
e-mail helpdesk and include the whole of this message
in your request. Alternatively, you can call them, with
the contents of this message to hand when you call.

At Fri Mar  3 10:16:07 2006 the virus scanner said:
   MailScanner: Executable DOS/Windows programs are dangerous in email (document.txt  .exe)

Note to Help Desk: Look on the NCSA MailScanner (mail) in /var/spool/mailimage/quarantine/20060303 (message k23GFtx28452).
-- 
Postmaster
National Center for Supercomputing Applications
www.ncsa.uiuc.edu

MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support

--- End Message ---
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index