DAST webform contact - Iperf
>X-Envelope-From: apache --at-- orca.ncsa.uiuc.edu
>X-Envelope-To: <mitch --at-- ncsa.uiuc.edu>
>Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 13:16:44 -0500
>From: Apache <apache --at-- ncsa.uiuc.edu>
>To: dfrench --at-- illinois.net
>Subject: DAST webform contact - Iperf
>X-NCSA-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the help --at-- ncsa.uiuc.edu for
more information
>X-NCSA-MailScanner: Found to be clean
>X-Deliver-To: mitch
>X-MD5SUM: 922a4252503a55dc15f14dfeecd28f1c
>X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on
> mail.ncsa.uiuc.edu
>X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
> version=2.61
>X-Spam-Level:
>
>
>
>Contacting DAST re: Request for information about Iperf
>
>
>Dirk French
>
>Email: dfrench --at-- illinois.net
>
>
>Question/Comment:
>
> I would like to use iperf as a netwrok benchmark tool h.323 video so
jitter results are important. I'm thinking the dualtest feature woul be
nice to use. However whne used jitter numbers jump. Is there a reson or
this and is there a typical jitier ms qty inherent in the application
itself. Running test with bakto to back routers with direclty attached PCs
or directly conencted PCs produce numbers as shown below. (the o ms jitter
is one way tests versu the high ms form dualtest. Thanks Much
>
>
>
>
--
Mitch Kutzko | mitch --at-- dast.nlanr.net | mitch --at-- ncsa.uiuc.edu | 217-333-1199
http://hobbes.ncsa.uiuc.edu/