DAST webform contact - Iperf
>X-Envelope-From: apache --at-- orca.ncsa.uiuc.edu
>X-Envelope-To: <mitch --at-- ncsa.uiuc.edu>
>Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 13:20:23 -0500
>From: Apache <apache --at-- ncsa.uiuc.edu>
>To: dfrench --at-- illinois.net
>Subject: DAST webform contact - Iperf
>X-NCSA-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the help --at-- ncsa.uiuc.edu for
more information
>X-NCSA-MailScanner: Found to be clean
>X-Deliver-To: mitch
>X-MD5SUM: 79395ee22d0f731f075846cb6e861ff8
>X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on
> mail.ncsa.uiuc.edu
>X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
> version=2.61
>X-Spam-Level:
>
>
>
>Contacting DAST re: Request for information about Iperf
>
>
>Dirk French
>
>Email: dfrench --at-- illinois.net
>
>
>Question/Comment:
>
> Excuse previous messageI would like to use iperf as a network benchmark
tool for h.323 video, so jitter results are important. I'm thinking the
dualtest feature woul be nice to use. However when used jitter numbers
jump. Is there a reason for this and is there a typical jitier ms qty
inherent in the application itself. Running test with back to to back
routers with direclty attached PCs or directly conencted PCs produce
numbers as shown below. (the 0 ms jitter is one way tests versu the high ms
from dualtest. Thanks Much 900] 28.0-29.0 sec 60.3 KBytes 494 Kbits/sec
0.000 ms 0/ 42 (0%)
>
>
>
>
--
Mitch Kutzko | mitch --at-- dast.nlanr.net | mitch --at-- ncsa.uiuc.edu | 217-333-1199
http://hobbes.ncsa.uiuc.edu/